@article{15960,
  author = {Magne J{\o}rgensen and Morten Welde and Torleif Halkjelsvik},
  title = {Evaluation of Probabilistic Project Cost Estimates},
  abstract = {Evaluation of cost estimates should be fair and give incentives for accuracy. These goals, we argue, are challenged by a lack of precision in what is meant by a cost estimate and the use of evaluation measures that do not reward the most accurate cost estimates. To improve the situation, we suggest the use of probabilistic cost estimates and propose guidelines on how to evaluate such estimates. The guidelines emphasize the importance of a match between the type of cost estimate provided by the estimators and the chosen cost evaluation measure, and the need for an evaluation of both the calibration and the informativeness of probabilistic cost estimates. The feasibility of the guidelines is exemplified in an analysis of a set of 69 large Norwegian governmental projects. The evaluation indicated that the projects had quite accurate and unbiased P50 estimates and that the prediction intervals were reasonably well calibrated. It also showed that the cost prediction intervals were non-informative with respect to differences in cost uncertainty and, consequently, not useful to identify projects with higher cost uncertainty. The results demonstrate the usefulness of applying the proposed cost estimation evaluation guidelines.},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management},
  pages = {1-16},
  month = {08/2021},
  publisher = {IEEE},
}